So, Alexander reluctantly turned back without confronting the Nandas. All this is glossed over by Western historians, in whose view the one victory over king Porus amounted to the conquest of India. But according to Battle of the Jhelum analysis which gives valid reasons why Alexander would have lost the battle taking into consideration of his exhausted army which had already fought many battles and had a long journey across the plain. According to Budge, in the Battle of Hydaspes, the Indians destroyed the majority of Alexanders cavalry. Alexander showed impressive courage and promise from a young age. At times, when we meet a good competitor, we start respecting the enemy. There was an immortal love story of Shah Jehan and he built the Taj Mahal in memory of his love, According to the Greeks, Alexander was apparently so impressed by Porus he gave back his kingdom plus the territories of king Ambhi of Taxila who had fought alongside the Macedonians. Because Nanda's army was huge and Alexander had no match to Nanda's army ! The Nandas were quite a powerful force, and the Greek troops had become war-weary (whether they actually refused orders is open to debate). How to take large amounts of money away from the party without causing player resentment? He was swift and fast. Chanakya played on the minds of Alexander and his troops to win the war.[ref]. Ambhi had become Alexanders ally on the condition he would be given Porus kingdom. Why Alexander does not take his army (like he taken from Persian) and fight wid other kingdom like nanda, since alexandar want full victory over whole asia. That the Greeks were the first to bring civilization to India, At least this is the mainstream view. Site design / logo 2023 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. Any way I will keep reading your excellent Blog and sharing it as much as possible,this is the small Alile Save that I can do,all the best. The Greek/Latin name Porus is a rendering of the Indian Puru, the throne name of the ruler of the kingdom Paurava. James Mill , in his History of of India states that India did not exist before 4000 years!I have corrected in the Post.Regds. I know like Froncois Gautier has been trying and has written a book published in 2013 Indian History as it happened. Alexander the Great Craterus Porus Seleucus I Nicator See all related content Battle of the Hydaspes, (326 bce ), fourth and last pitched battle fought by Alexander the Great during his campaign of conquest in Asia. I have heard, though I have not consulted, that the eastern accounts of the war had Alexander the Great losing those initial battles and realized that he could not win, and then he decided to return to his kingdoms. Although he lost the battle, he became the most successful recorded opponent of Alexander. Is there a finite abelian group which is not isomorphic to either the additive or multiplicative group of a field. With 30,000 infantry, 300 chariots and 200 elephants, Porus's soldiers waited on the other side of the river. He wanted all the kings to unite as one force and fight against Alexander. The flora and fauna of the country at the time had numerous varieties of fruits and vegetables to offer. The latter seems to be true in the light of Alexanders remains having been found to contain evidence of poisoning. But recently I've read accounts that the battle ended with the defeat of Alexander. My article was written before I saw the film. True to Indian traditions, the magnanimous Indian king spared the life of the surrendered enemy. I notice even portion of International history on China is more un biased and gives many positive contributions of Chinese civilization. Alexander followed his fathers dream to conquer the lands beyond their kingdom. His priorities were limited to Magadh and he was confident that when Alexander reached Magadh, he would defeat the invader. I upvote because of the 2nd point. Note: The above article is an exact (with very minor changes) reproduction of a twitter thread on Puru and Alexander by Aabhas Maldahiyar. According to Budge, who worked for the British Museum in the early part of the 20th century, in the Battle of Hydaspes the Indians destroyed the majority of Alexanders cavalry? Alexander killed the son and destroyed the cavalry and chariots; the few survivors fled back to Porus. Should I be concerned about the structural integrity of this 100-year-old garage? The comman opinion is that Sanaathana Dharma will start deteriorating due to the Advent of Kali Yuga and our Bharatha Varsha will be ruled by Yavanas, Mlechhas etc who will spread canards and false informations about our great Past. Porus | Indian prince | Britannica You read a history which is convincing for you. An unbiased re-examination suggests the Greeks had lost the battle. Porus (Old Indian Puru): king in the eastern Punjab, defeated in 326 BCE by Alexander the Great. \r\rEurocentric historians of 20th century hastily concluded based on Arrian\\s work that Alexander won the battle and then allowed Porus to rule a much larger than his original kingdom out of the goodness of his heart. Next time you hear someone talking about those eastern accounts, please ask them for specific references. What saved them from Alexander was their neighbor - Porus was an above-average strategist and a great statesman. In his epic, The LifeandExploits of Alexanderthe Great, a series of translations of the Ethiopic histories of Alexander, E.A.W. You are not allowed to edit this article at this level. Why the difference of opinion about the disappearance of Subhas Chandra Bose. Porus - Jatland Wiki Also the Greeks and other ancient peoples did not see themselves as in any way superior, only different.. Aurangazeb was a pious and noble man. What's it called when a word that starts with a vowel takes the 'n' from 'an' (the indefinite article) and puts it on the word? Porus Defeated Spared Alexander Life - Ramanisblog Everyone's history glorifies their own exploits, and everyone gets a happy ending. As about 5000 years of History has been suppressed and misinterpreted, it is an arduous task. You may not have any power. Not much information is available about his life or about his success or failure in the war against Alexander due to loss of historical texts ! greek - Did Alexander the Great win or lose against Porus (before the I must say that the only source where I have heard that Alexander the Great lost is from Indians, which seems like a reasonably biased source. Alexander built cities to the east of Porus' kingdom after defeating Porus, so he definitely did not lose to Porus. But the Greeks made no such claim, Greek contemporary writers describe the Battle of Hydaspes (Jhelum) as the hardest fought of all Alexanders battles. He got his forces in secret and attacked Porus. Wrong. Alexander took stock of the battle as a lesson learnt. By accepting the position from Alexander, Porus got to keep control of his country without risking a second or third battle. They came to loot and destroy. Arya Chanakya and defeat of Alexander | Encyclopedia of History Sensing defeat they called for a truce, which Porus accepted. Why is this? Our editors will review what youve submitted and determine whether to revise the article. Specifically, I want to know what actually happened in the battle between Alexander and Porus: Who won? In reality, the Greek-Macedonian force, after having lost several thousand soldiers fighting much smaller Indian mountain cities, were terrified at the prospect of fighting the fierce Paurava army. History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. Neither is there any guarantee that it did not. Thereafter a supporter of Alexander, Porus held the position of a Macedonian subordinate ruler when he was assassinated, sometime between 321 and 315 bce, by Eudemus, one of Alexanders generals, after the death of Alexander. Did Alexander really defeat Porus at the Battle of Hydaspes? Indian History taught at school begins with the Invasion of India as the beginning of Real (?) The girls reminded them of their families left behind at home. Military strategy says Never invade landlocked nation (Afghanistan) It was a "win-win" (limited victory) situation for both sides. Lateral loading strength of a bicycle wheel. Porus, (flourished 4th century bce), Indian prince who ruled the region between the Hydaspes (Jhelum) and Acesines (Chenab) rivers at the time of Alexander the Greats invasion (327326 bce) of the Punjab. In BC 327 Alexander came to India, and tried to cross the Jhelum river for the invasion, but was then confronted by King Purushottama (King Porus, according to the English rendition.) Alexander the Great: Empire & Death | HISTORY - HISTORY There are some people who like to downvote unnecessarily. According to the Greeks, Alexander was apparently so impressed by Porus that he gave back his kingdom plus the territories of king Ambhi of Taxila who had fought alongside the Macedonians. Thank you for your prompt reply. Are there Indian accounts of the Battle of the Hydaspes Rivers? Alexanders army did not indulge in celebrations after the Battle of Gaugamela where they defeated 200,000 Persians. With that approach in mind, he appealed to Dhana Nanda, the most powerful king of those days, the ruler of Magadh, who also had the largest army. So why reward the enemy, whose army had just mauled the Macedonians? Todd Feinman Joined Oct 2013 7,065 Posts | 489+ Changraupta himself, in his younger year, is said to have seen the build up and growing panic among the Indian kingdoms in anticipation of the impending battle between Alexander and Porus. [duplicate], Indian account of the Battle of the Hydaspes River. History Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for historians and history buffs. Even so, after a fierce battle in a raging thunderstorm, Porus was defeated. But the catch is Megasthanes never met Chandra Gupta Maurya. He had a powerful army along with nerves of steel. This must have left a bad taste in his mouth as he thought the Eastern Sea could be reached in a relatively short time. The Battlefield This is the story of two determined men. This indicates that perhaps Porus his predecessor had already been paying taxes/tributes to the Persian empire, which doesn't make it surprising at all that Porus would accept a similar agreement after losing a battle. Alexander appointing Selucus as Alexanders representative in India. According to the Roman historian Marcus Justinus, the battle was savagely fought. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. Alexander, having won all the kingdoms west of Greece up-to Bacteria ( Persia) , proceeded to India ,defeated many kings and finally met his foe Porus in Punjab. Indian campaign of Alexander the Great - Wikipedia His army was shocked to see the huge army and war elephants facing them. In 326 BC, a young and ambitious Alexander the Great led his army against the mighty Indian king, Porus, on the banks of the Hydaspes River. The mutiny is mentioned in Greek sources, and it makes sense, at that point in time Alexander's army had no realistic goal (reaching the end of the world isn't particularly realistic). Did Alexander the Great destroy a city to demonstrate his ability to reign? King Porus (), the Greek version of the Indian names Puru, Pururava, or Parvata, was the ruler of a Kingdom in Punjab located between the Jhelum and the Chenab (in Greek, the Hydaspes and the Acesines) rivers in the Punjab. To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. King Puru AKA Porus The Powerful - The Inner World For me as an Indian I know from history which says war can be won without bloodshed. There was enough for everyone for basic survival. One was a warrior Alexander or Sikander, a young, determined leader out to conquer the world. Chanakya was not impressed with the information that they had brought. Bosworth alleges that \"Arrian was prone to the errors of misunderstanding and faulty source conflation that one would expect in a secondary historian of antiquity\".\r\rPointing out several mistakes and general arbitrariness in Arrian's treatment of his primary sources, Bosworth points out that \"Arrian is prone to misread and misinterpret his primary sources, and the smooth flow of his narrative can obscure treacherous quicksands of error\".\r\rBosworth further points out that \"Arrian makes it quite plain that his work is designed as a literary showpiece. Why was Alexander defeated by Porus? They say if the people of Punjab and Sindh were fierce, then in the eastern part of India the men were superior in stature and courage. Secondly the invasion by foreigners, who , realizing that the Indians could not be subjugated without destroying their faith in their Religion, their History as enumerated in their Puranas and the science as revealed in the Vedas and other Sanskrit Texts ( and in regional languages as well), destroyed this faith in the garb of bringing in western education and culture. The Story of Alexander the Great's Invasion of India - Learn Religions Was it true that King Porus defeated Alexander and made him flee back to Greece ? Did King Porus's men use snake poison against Alexander's troops? Ramanan,do you a road map ,how and when this can change?. It was the first time Europeans and Indians looked into one another's . Regards. Did Alexander lost to Porus? - TimesMojo When there is dust in the eyes, the fingers will rub it out of the eyes. He tried to raise the issue of equality amongst the citizens of the land of Bharat, pointing out that Magadh was a part of Bharat. Mr. Ramani,sir,can you tell whether there is any archeological evidence that king Prasenjit was a descendent of raghubamsha? Alexander saw their courage and braveness face to face in the time of war who were in his mythological stories. Much of empire building is just a matter of who you pay taxes too. There were Aryans who entered India through the Khyber Pass and drove the Dravidians south, Plutarch wrote: "Alexander, in his own letters, has given us an account of his war with Porus. Each got what they most wanted out of the situation without having to risk everything. The only possible answer is at the Battle of Hydaspes, the Macedonians realised they were dealing with an enemy of uncommon valour. Budge, Egyptologist, orientalist and philologist,has given a vivid account of same. Chanakya had a number of students under his tutelage, both male and female.